Herramientas para la Investigación Actual y Futura desde la Perspectiva del Docente Investigador

Barra lateral del artículo

PDF

Contenido principal del artículo

Edwin Gerardo Acuña Acuña
Universidad Hispanoamericana, Costa Rica
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7897-4137

Resumen

El artículo hace un recorrido crítico por las herramientas de hoy y mañana en la investigación, desde la mirada de un docente investigador. Se hace un recorrido por la historia de la investigación científica en la era digital, con la inteligencia artificial, el big data, las plataformas bibliométricas y los entornos de ciencia abierta como potenciadores de la productividad y la innovación en la academia. El artículo destaca cómo la digitalización ha transformado la investigación, haciéndola más colaborativa, transparente y rigurosa en su metodología. Con años de experiencia en la enseñanza e investigación, propone un marco que unifica las epistemologías tradicionales con los nuevos paradigmas tecnológicos, buscando reconciliar la interpretación humana con la eficiencia computacional. También hace énfasis en la capacitación continua del investigador y el uso ético de la tecnología como aseguradores de la calidad y honestidad en la producción científica. En definitiva, este artículo proporciona una mirada anticipatoria de cómo los educadores e investigadores pueden evolucionar y tomar la delantera en un futuro convergente tecnológico que está revolucionando la ciencia.

Información del artículo
Publicado: May 5, 2026
Número: Vol. 2 (2025): II Congreso Internacional de Revistas Científicas CIR. 26 y 27 de noviembre de 2025, Talca, Chile.
Sección: Artículos CIR
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29035/CIR.2025.1937
Palabras clave: Inteligencia artificial, Transformación digital, Ciencia abierta, Ética en la investigación, Productividad académica

Detalles del artículo

Referencias

Akl, E. A., Kahale, L., Schwingshackl, L., et al. (2024). Extension of the PRISMA 2020 statement for living systematic reviews (PRISMA-LSR): Checklist and explanation. BMJ, 387, e079183. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-079183

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Thematic analysis: A practical guide (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529780453

Chakravorti, T., Wang, X., Venkit, P. N., Koneru, S., Munger, K., & Rajtmajer, S. (2025). Social Scientists on the Role of AI in Research. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.11255

Cheng, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence–assisted academic writing: Recommendations and critical appraisal. Advances in Simulation, 10, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-025-00350-6

Colavizza, G., Cadwallader, L., & Hrynaszkiewicz, I. (2025). An analysis of the effects of open science indicators on citations in the French Open Science Monitor. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.20747

Cole, N. L., Masuzzo, P., & Klebel, T. (2024). The societal impact of open science: A scoping review. Royal Society Open Science, 11(6), 240286. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.240286

Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (2024). Ethical guidelines for peer reviewers and authors. COPE Council. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2024.1.1

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2024). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071896794

Digital Science. (2024). The State of Open Data 2024: Special Report. Digital Science. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26570945

Doskaliuk, B., Zimba, O., Yessirkepov, M., et al. (2025). Artificial intelligence in peer review: Enhancing efficiency while preserving integrity. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 40, e92. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e92

European Commission. (2024). Open science monitoring 2024: Policy recommendations and implementation report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2777/735472

Fecher, B., & Friesike, S. (2024). Open science: One term, five schools of thought. In S. Bartling & S. Friesike (Eds.), Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3

Fernández-Martínez, A., Pérez, M., & Rivas, C. (2024). Academic ethics and AI tools: Challenges for responsible research. Ethics & Education, 19(2), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2024.1123457

García-Sánchez, E., Morales, P., & Duarte, V. (2025). Digital literacy and AI adoption among university faculty. Computers & Education Open, 6, 100233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100233

Gibney, E. (2025). Scientists hide messages in papers to game AI peer review. Nature, 643(8073), 887–888. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-02172-y

González-Soltero, R., Pino-García, D., Bellido, A., Ryan, P., & Rodríguez-Learte, A. I. (2024). FAIR data management: A framework for fostering data literacy in biomedical sciences education. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 24, 284. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02404-1

Hilty, L. M., Aebischer, B., & Meyer, S. (2025). Institutional infrastructures for open research: Challenges and solutions. Journal of Open Research Infrastructure, 11(1), 345. https://doi.org/10.5334/joir.345

Klebel, T., Kousha, K., Khabsa, M., et al. (2025). The academic impact of open science: A scoping review. Royal Society Open Science, 12(2), 241248. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.241248

Lee, J., Kim, H., & Park, S. (2024). Evaluating AI-assisted writing tools: Strengths and limitations. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 55(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.55.2.123

Li, H., & Zhao, T. (2025). Collaborative intelligence in academic writing: Human-AI co-creation models. AI and Society, 40(1), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01753-9

Li, Z. Q., Xu, H. L., Cao, H. J., et al. (2024). Use of artificial intelligence in peer review among top 100 medical journals. JAMA Network Open, 7(12), e2448609. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.48609

Martens, B., Zuccala, A., & Corneliussen, H. (2024). Barriers and enablers in implementing open science practices in universities. Science and Public Policy, 51(4), 567–581. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scxabc1

Martínez-Gómez, J., & Pérez-Ramos, L. (2025). Digital competencies for sustainable research ecosystems. Higher Education Research & Development, 44(3), 556-573. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2025.1143129

McMurry, J. A., Sansone, S.-A., & Rocca-Serra, P. (2024). FAIRsharing: Working with and for the community to describe and link data standards, repositories and policies. Bioinformatics, 40(4), 1239–1245. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btad123

MIT Sloan Management Review. (2025). Machine Learning and Generative AI: What Are They Good For? MIT Sloan Ideas Made to Matter. https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/machine-learning-and-generative-ai-what-are-they-good-for

Mugahid, D., et al. (2025). A practical guide to FAIR data management in the age of multi-modal data. Frontiers in Immunology, 16, 1439434. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1439434

Ng, J. Y., et al. (2025). Guidance for the reporting of bibliometric analyses: A scoping review. Quantitative Science Studies, 6, 988–1001. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss.a.12

Nguyen, T., Wang, J., & Patel, S. (2025). Transparency and accountability in AI-augmented peer review. Science & Engineering Ethics, 31(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-024-00789-2

Perlis, R. H., Christakis, D. A., Bressler, N. M., et al. (2025). Artificial intelligence in peer review. JAMA. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2025.15827

Priem, J., Piwowar, H., & Orr, R. (2025). Rethinking scholarly impact: Building robust evaluation via open tools. Research Evaluation, 34(2), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvzbbb

Seep, L., Grein, S., Splichalova, I., et al. (2024). From planning stage towards FAIR data: A practical metadatasheet for biomedical scientists. Scientific Data, 11, 155. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03349-2

Smith, A., Johnson, R., & Lee, C. (2025). The role of AI in peer review: Potentials and pitfalls. Learned Publishing, 38(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.143

State of AI Report. (2025). State of AI Report 2025. https://www.stateof.ai

Tennant, J. P., & Crick, T. (2024). Human-machine symbiosis in open research workflows. PLOS Computational Biology, 20(10), e1011659. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011659

Tennant, J. P., Ross-Hellauer, T., & Crick, T. (2024). The changing landscape of open scholarship. PLOS Biology, 22(3), e3002210. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002210

UNESCO. (2025). Ethical principles for the governance of artificial intelligence in higher education and research. Paris: UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/unesco.ai.2025

Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., et al. (2024). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 11(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-00576-8

World Health Organization (WHO). (2024). Responsible use of artificial intelligence in scientific research: Ethical guidance for health and data sciences. Geneva: WHO. https://doi.org/10.26719/9789240094572

Yin, R. K. (2023). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071896800

Estadísticas de descarga
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.noStats##
Información de la licencia
Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.

Licencia de Creative Commons
Esta obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional